is it fair to think of aave v4 hub+spoke model as essentially one big vault with one big risk manager?
whereas euler/morpho have any number of vaults each with its own manager?
and if there's a poor risk management decision in aave v4, the entire liquidity pool is at risk?
take the stream finance issue
if aave v4 allowed xassets as collateral, then wouldn't all lenders across all spokes have exposure to the bad debt?
theoretically
1.76K
1
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.